Archive - Research 2.0 RSS Feed

Show me the evidence

I was asked by a clinical researcher today what the point was of social media. To put this in context, this is about site that I set up 10 months ago, in a niche area of neuroscience research. The blog now has a steady 4000 unique visitors a month, 7000 page views all through the use of social media. The point may seem obvious, except it was the owner of the site who was asking me.

I was about to trot off the stats in order to justify my existence but then thought, he’s right. Can I really measure the effect? Can I provide evidence-based results that shows that those 4000 visitors have had a positive impact from visiting the blog, and that it has improved their clinical practice?

I can provide readership stats, but clinical impact. Nope.

Print

Putting raw data on the web

Something close to my heart – sharing of information. This TED talk by Tim Berners Lee shows the benefits of sharing data on the web – for clinicians and researchers this is a big deal, publication of experiments in top journals can result in major funding and raw data is often closely guarded.

But…when data is freely shared the results are impressive.

Print

How do I use feedly and what is feedly

Here is my practical video demonstration on how to use feedly and why. feedly is a RSS reader and from a research point of view it’s essential. It is a tool that is useful for

  • staying current
  • sharing with your network
  • bookmarking research
  • keeping in touch with what other experts are doing…

all in one place. Here’s how to do it:

Feedly is based on Google Reader, which means you will need a Google account (ie have a gmail address) to log in. If you are researching and wanting to keep up to date easily, an RSS reader like feedly is essential. Download it here.

UPDATE:

Feedly have just featured this video on their blog building feedly along with some changes they may make as a result.

What they also have are some very helpful tips about how to use feedly for Google chrome which I am about to implement myself. Thanks guys!

Print

Developing a Digital Strategy 004 – Examples of Social Media Policies, Kodak

Kodak have an extensive and clear social media policy for their employees, and have managed to embrace social media in a way few companies have yet done.  Extracts of their policy:

Kodak Social Media Policies

We developed a social media policy for Kodak employees that you might find helpful for your organization. Our people from Marketing, Information Systems, Legal, and Corporate Communications worked together to create these 10 “rules.” We hope that you find them helpful. Feel free to edit to suit your needs. [Note: How many companies would allow that in their policies?]

kodak convergence media tactics 1024x571 Developing a Digital Strategy 004   Examples of Social Media Policies, Kodak

Kodak has been growing its participation in social media to strengthen our brand and our connection with customers and key influencers. Networking sites like Facebook, Twitter, and MySpace, news sharing and bookmarking sites like delicious and Digg, and photo- and video-sharing sites like flickr and YouTube can be exciting new avenues for communication in our professional and personal lives. Used responsibly, they provide an effective way to keep abreast of new trends and topics, and to share information and perspectives.

Given the reach of the internet, it’s important that when you use these various media, you follow some basic procedures that support our “one voice” policy as described in the Business Conduct Guide. That policy applies to Kodak employees when they blog or participate in social media for work, but it should also be considered if personal blog activities may give the appearance of speaking for Kodak. Adhering to the following points in either situation will provide protection for you and Kodak.

Maintaining a good reputation – yours and Kodak’s

1. Live the Kodak values. Always express ideas and opinions in a respectful manner

  • Make sure your communications are in good taste
  • Be sensitive about linking to content. Redirecting to another site may imply an endorsement of its content.
  • Do not denigrate or insult others, including competitors.

2. Be yourself – and be transparent

Even when you are talking as an individual, people may perceive you to be talking on behalf of Kodak. If you blog or discuss photography, printing or other topics related to a Kodak business, be upfront and explain that you work for Kodak; however, if you aren’t an official company spokesperson, add a disclaimer to the effect: “The opinions and positions expressed are my own and don’t necessarily reflect those of Eastman Kodak Company.” Also, only those authorized by a company may use that company’s logos and trade dress in communications, so be sure you do not include Kodak brand symbols or trade dress – or that of other companies – in your personal blogs or postings.

3. Protect confidential information and relationships

  • avoid identifying and discussing others – including customers; suppliers, your friends and co-workers – unless you have their permission
  • obtain permission before posting pictures of others, or before posting copyrighted information;
  • never discuss proprietary Kodak information, including sales data and plans, company finances, strategies, product launch information, unannounced technology or anything considered “confidential.”

4. Speak the truth

If you are in a discussion that relates to Kodak or its products, don’t make unsubstantiated claims about features, performance or pricing.

5. Keep your cool

One of the aims of social media is to create dialogue, and people won’t always agree on an issue. When confronted with a difference of opinion, stay cool. Express your points in a clear, logical way. Don’t pick fights, and correct mistakes when needed. Sometimes, it’s best to ignore a comment and not give it credibility by acknowledging it with a response.

6. Stay timely

Part of the appeal in social media is that the conversation occurs almost in real time. So, if you are going to participate in an active way, make sure you are willing to take the time to refresh content, respond to questions and update information regularly, and correct information when appropriate.

Protecting your, and Kodak’s, privacy and resources

7. Be careful with personal information

This may seem odd, since many sites are created to help promote sharing of personal information. Still, astute criminals can piece together information you provide on different sites and then use it to impersonate you or someone you know – or even re-set your passwords. Similarly, “tweeting” real-time about your travels may confirm you aren’t at home – letting someone target your house. So, be careful when sharing information about yourself or others.

8. Don’t be fooled
If you do post personal information on a site like Facebook or Twitter, criminals can use it to send you emails that appear to come from a friend or other trusted source – even the site itself. This is called “phishing.” The lesson is: Don’t click links or attachments unless you trust the source. For example, be wary of emails that say there is a problem with your account, then ask you to click on a link and input your username and password. The link may connect to a site that looks exactly like Facebook, Twitter, your bank’s web site, but is really a fake site used to get even more personal information. This ploy can also be used to infect your computer with a virus or keystroke logger.

9. Disable dangerous privileges

If a site allows others to embed code – like HTML postings, links, and file attachments – on your page or account, criminals can use them install malicious software on your computer. If possible, disable the ability of others to post HTML comments on your home page.

10. Heed security warnings and pop-ups

There’s a reason your security software provides warnings like:

  • “A process is attempting to invoke xyz.exe. Do you wish to allow this?”
  • “The process ‘IEXPLORE.EXE’ is attempting to modify a document ‘X.’ Do you wish to allow this?”

Never allow or say “yes” to such actions, unless you know that they are safe.

Note for employees:
Even when you are talking as an individual, people may perceive you to be talking on behalf of Kodak. If you blog or discuss photography, printing or other topics related to a Kodak business, be upfront and explain that you work for Kodak; however, if you aren’t an official company spokesperson, add a disclaimer to the effect: “The opinions and positions expressed are my own and don’t necessarily reflect those of Eastman Kodak Company.”

Kodak’s social media policy is an example of a proactive policy which will enable the staff who are good to shine, to the benefit of the company.  This is in stark contrast to the Washington Post approach which states that in the case of using social networking tools for personal reasons ‘all Washington Post journalists relinquish some of the personal privileges of private citizens’. My bet is that Kodak’s strategy will be far more beneficial to the company, and they will retain the best staff as a result.

Print

The Clean Industrial Revolution – An Experiment Using Social Media In Publishing

I have been approached by Allen & Unwin, Book Publishers, to use some less traditional ways to connect with readers – and using a newly published book seems a good place to start.  This is an experiment, an ongoing project over the next 3 months open to change and trialling things depending on your feedback. Will using Social Media make any difference at all?  I like the Publisher, Elizabeth Weiss, I like the book and am happy to be involved.

The Clean Industrial Revolution: growing Australian prosperity in a greenhouse age published 3 weeks ago, written by Ben McNeil known for his work on climate change and energy policy in Australia (Sydney Morning Herald, The Age, The Australian Financial Review, The Australian and The Canberra Times, radio and television appearances). clean industrial revolution The Clean Industrial Revolution   An Experiment Using Social Media In Publishingben mcneil The Clean Industrial Revolution   An Experiment Using Social Media In Publishing

Ben also recently joined Twitter, started a blog and is doing a book signing at UNSW bookshop on Wednesday where I hope to interview him.

To see how news of The Clean Industrial Revolution spreads on social media channels like Twitter, Facebook or Friendfeed, we’ve opted to give a 27% discount on the book – we want the discount to be big and different.

I have signed copies of the book to give away, 9 copies every month for the next 3 months. Signed books will be given for new ideas, comments, suggestions, feedback.

First thing, while I’m waiting to meet Ben, is to think of a hashtag for twitter that can also be used as a code to get the discount on the Publisher’s website.  Suggestions welcome (preferably something to do with the subject matter), and whichever suggestion we use will get the first of this months free signed copies.

We would like to start this officially by Friday, so I’ll need suggestions for #hashtags before then.

Some excerpts from the book:

In 2007, I was in Canberra as a young scientist pushing the scientific case for action and learning very quickly that the government was completely blind to the gravity of potential threats to Australia beyond just the environment.  At a high-level meeting in the Cabinet room, as I looked in awe around me, all I could see was a sea of grey hair and suits clustered around the biggest table I had ever seen.

Sitting to my right was the Prime Minister, John Howard, the Minister for Education and Science, Julie Bishop, the Environment Minister, Malcolm Turnbull, and the Minister for Industry, Ian Macfarlane.  Scattered among the rest of the Cabinet were the heads of every science, research technology and education body in Australia.

Before my presentation, three of Australia’s most influential climate scientists presented an exhaustive report of recommendations on how Australia could actively respond to the emerging climate of change.  As I stared down the Cabinet room I wondered why the two most senior government minsters responsible for the economy and foreign policy were not in the room.  Where were the Treasure and the Foreign Minster?  It seems for many years the Australian Government reflected a broad and dangerous public misconception about combating climate change:  that is it has nothing to do with Australia’s long-term economic prosperity or national security.

This book has one overarching theme: that climate change and our over-reliance on fossil fuels will put Australia’s economic prosperity, not just the environment, at great risk.  The only way to boost the prospects of stabilising our climate, and grow Australia’s economy in a world that will move away from carbon, coal and oil, is to slash carbon emissions and foster a new, clean low-carbon industrial revolution.  These new Australian products and technologies will be craved in a world short on oil and high on carbon and would position Australia as a leading clean-tech hub for a growing Asia.

Dont forget to leave your ideas for a codename/hashtag reference for people to use.  The best we’ve come up with is #GreenCollar…

Declaration: I will at no point be receiving any money from sales of this book.

Print

How To Assess Wikis and Group Learning – WikiNavMap, PeerWise…

Collaborative learning is all very well, but how do you assess quality of individual learning in multi-authored projects and collaborative tasks such as wiki projects?  How do students, who know nothing about a subject, teach other students about the same subject, and assess each other along the way – and what happened to the lecturer?

The concept: students mark each others papers, set each other questions with associated answers (which aren’t checked to see if they are correct) and assess each other.

New tools to measure the quality of learning, were described by John Hamer, (University of Auckland, NZ) at a recent EducauseAustralia conference. For example, Aropä and PeerWise support collaborative learning in large, undergraduate classes - Aropä enables students to referee their peers coursework and PeerWise is a data bank of multi-choice questions contributed, explained and discussed entirely by students.

aropa How To Assess Wikis and Group Learning   WikiNavMap, PeerWise...

“These systems leverage the latent intellectual capacity of a large class to provide new opportunities for learning.  Using Aropä each student might review three or four essays and receive a corresponding amount of feedback, all within a few days.  The immediacy and diversity of the feedback is substantially greater than can be produced by a tutor.  While the quality of the reviewing is typically variable, there are affective benefits in challenging students to distinguish between good and poor feedback.  By eliminating the stamp of authority and introducing diverse, possibly conflicting feedback, students are required to exercise their critical judgement in deciding what information to accept and reject.

peerwise How To Assess Wikis and Group Learning   WikiNavMap, PeerWise...

Peerwise leverages the energy of a large class in a different way, building an annotated question bank that can contain 1000’s of multiple-choice questions. Each question is accompanied by an explanation written by the question author, overall quality and difficult ratings assigned by students who have answered
It is no longer about right or wrong answers but about the learning process, applying and understanding what you are learning, while you are learning.

A whole new way of learning but also questioning, changing from one that is hierachical, (experts vs students) to being able to learn from your peers.
Feedback from students shows high levels of participation – students state that they don’t value the feedback they get from other students highly but they do see benefit in writing reviews and also value seeing other student work, benefit perceived in reviewing both exemplary and weak work.

  • Greater involvement with task = greater time on task = greater learning
  • Change in power relations between author and reviewer, student and lecturer
  • Greater social involvement – Students are not graded on right questions but on contribution made and the comments and feedback given (imagine the discussion if you question the marks given to you by your fellow student)
  • Rich trace of student performance
  • Assessment becomes a part of the learning process
  • And a big plus: Department marking budget available for redistribution to remedial tutoring

trac

Other tools include trac an enhanced wiki and issue tracking system for software development projects. It allows wiki markup and includes a timeline showing all current and past project giving an overview of the project and tracking progress very easy.

WikiNavMap

Uses the trac environment to visualise a wiki structure and how it changes from the 1st week to the end of the year, showing individual students contributions and teamwork.  It answers questions like
* What does the whole wiki look like now?
* What was happening in April, September and May 2009?
* What did the wiki look like at the end of 2008?
* Which wiki pages did Mary contribute to?

Glosser

glosser How To Assess Wikis and Group Learning   WikiNavMap, PeerWise...

Developed by the Universityof Sydney supports collaborative writing, particularly for students writing academic essays.
Glosser supports the writing  giving a series of tools to help reflect and improvie writing by 1) scaffolding their reflection with trigger questions, and 2) using text mining techniques to provide content clues that can help answer those questions.

glosser map How To Assess Wikis and Group Learning   WikiNavMap, PeerWise...

They didn’t learn me like that when I was at school, that’s for sure.

And to see coverage on the Educause Australia Conference on Twitter, including this presentation, search twitter using #EdAust09

Related Posts with Thumbnails

Print
Page 1 of 212»