A Solitary Journey In Publishing
Oxford was publishing central as far as I was concerned, and Oxford University Press was It. The bees knees. Starting out in publishing as Journals Editorial Assistant for EMBO (the European Molecular Biology Organisation, now published by Nature), it took us 10 weeks from receipt of manuscript to publishing a chunky fortnightly journal, despite my lack of proofreading and copyediting skills. After a year or so I got fidgety and moved departments to start work in Science and Medical Books.
They were a mad lot, working all hours while introducing me to many of the Oxford pubs and how not to play pool (UK rules). They were managed by JM, a forward thinking Publishing Director who started the Oxford Handbook Series including the Oxford Handbook of Clinical Medicine with the then Commissioning Editor. That’s my only claim to fame – fame by faint association. My job, much later and in the lower echelons as Development Editor, was to take a raw manuscript and manage its production into a bona fide book. Amongst the Editors muttering into their beards in the Dictionary Department, and Professors deliberating about their ideas for the Royal Society I learned about the Oxford Comma and that it took 7 full months to publish a book. I also learned about unspoken publishing territories – when phoning an author to ask to see him about queries on his manuscript the Commissioning Editor put in a complaint – how dare I consider visiting her author. To this day I have never figured out the concept Editors have about owning Authors.
At OUP Commissioning Editors stay in their jobs for approximately 42 years, these are coveted roles and if you want to progress in Editorial you move to another publishing company. So, despite my fondness for that great Publishing Institution I began work at a small medical publisher, Radcliffe Medical Press (now Radcliffe Publishing) as a medical Commissioning Editor – and learnt how to publish on a hunch, gut feel (at OUP, there were several rounds of meetings to go through before a proposal saw the light of day, not to mention The Delegates [you have to read ‘The Delegates’ in hushed tones], who often had the final say on a publishing idea). By contrast, Radcliffe was a small, nimble company and I had a Manager who tried new ideas suggested to her by maverick General Practitioner Authors, to the consternation of her co-Directors and to my benefit – it was a great way to learn what Commissioning books was all about.
Then a move to Elsevier and Publishing in a global company both in Oxford and Sydney. I learnt how authors and their work travel across countries and boundaries, markets and languages, and watched as my expectations as Publisher as well as those of Authors grew and changed, as Authors rightly seek more autonomy in an industry looking to adapt.

An ‘academic’ Publisher often negotiates on the Authors behalf with the Publishing House (different from ‘Trade’ Publishing where Authors tend to have an Agent). As publishing changed I found my role also developing – whereas before I had clear ideas on the pros and cons of copyright, electronic rights, translations etc, I found these altered as individual publishing became easier, information became more accessible online, and the need for traditional publishing altered. For the last few months I have asked this question:
‘What is it that I actually do?’
Whereas previously I facilitated a publishing process and provided added benefit for an Author trying to get their work into print, now there are many different ways to publish with a far wider choice. This is a good development in my opinion.
Quality information, ideas, at many different levels are widely available, easier to access and I experience, for the first time, being part of a global diverse community, without hierarchy, part of sharing ideas and information with people who I would not otherwise have got to interact with. In answer to my question ‘what is it that I actually do?’ I still facilitate, but now
I facilitate new ways of sharing content based on conversations happening in the community I am part of
At a recent conference in Sydney, wandering through the various exhibitor stands, I met a couple of Editors and while we chatted I admired their four colour books on Australia flora and fauna (and wondered how on earth do they afford to print them) – and I hear they’ve got a great manager who came over from Oxford, JM is his name. So, it seems I had come full circle.
I wrote, and tentatively asked if he remembered me, (wonder of wonders – yes) and when I look him up 15 years later, he is the same – a brain the size of a planet with a wry sense of humour, and I am still in awe of him. And we begin to talk about our journey in Publishing, and onto new developments, open source content, dissemination of information, and I introduce him to my new community including my twitter friends and they respond. A new era, for both of us.
Now it is time to move on. My love of publishing is still the same and I am taking a peek round the corner to see what will happen next.










I loved reading this, and it got me thinking about my own journey. Funnily enough, I took your job when you left Radcliffe. I lasted 7 months before admitting that I was a journals publisher through and through and books weren’t for me. I returned to my roots leaving the Maverick GPs to others… Good luck in your new venture.
[Reply]
Hi Liz — publishing is such a small (global) world! I was in two minds whether to publish this post, am glad I did now. Sounds like you’ve found your roots, there are so many different avenues to go down in publishing, and you never know you might find yourself on the other side of the globe at some point. Thanks for your good wishes, it will be very interesting to see what happens – frankly, I have no idea what is round the corner, but I’m looking forward to it.
[Reply]
Hi Heidi,
Good to read about your journey in editing world. At first (back in 1993) BH saw PhysioTools as a publishing competitor whilst we saw ourselves as software. Now we are coming closer to publishing and playing the part of an editor is not what we where set up for originally. Today we (=read mostly Nora) have dipped our feet in the editorial waters and I know it takes the patience of a saint and persuasive powers of a good woman to get the job done. Mybe we could talk about i some time.
[Reply]
Heidi Allen Reply:
May 28th, 2009 at 9:45 am
Hi Mark. You were so far ahead of the game traditional publishing didn’t know what to do with you at the time – and what they didn’t understand they saw as a threat. Now PhysioTools has become well known and much used, and complements the print products really well. It’s a great fit and you guys have really made it work. Yes, would be great to talk — are you coming to Sydney anytime soon? or we could skype, twitter, friendfeed (or even… dare I say it… email).
[Reply]
Great to be reminded of the humble beginnings . . . there have been so many highs along the way, including friends, travel and more friends. I know that you never look back and it won’t be long before you have done more than peek around that corner! Good luck from a fellow publisher, still in the traditional way of doing things . . . .
[Reply]
Heidi Allen Reply:
May 28th, 2009 at 9:37 am
Hello Mel! Having watched you turn around more than one situation in Publishing to its benefit it will be interesting to see what you do next. Suspect we’re both peeking round the corner looking at new innovations in Publishing.
[Reply]